Search Construction Advisor Today

  • constructionadvisortoday.com

Bookmark and Share

« Lennox Announces Availability of BIM Objects for Energence, Landmark Rooftop Product Lines | Main | Applied Software Joins FM:Systems Business Partner Program »



Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

In my experience reasonable notice requirements are legitimate and are essential to protect the owner's interests and allow the owner to mitigate the issue. It also allows contemporaneous evaluation of costs.

In most cases providing notice is not an onerous requirement. A simple, short letter satisfies the requirement. We request the notice, but we also ask every week in the progress meeting if there are any potential impacts on the horizon. We really would prefer to catch problems early when we can influence the outcome.

For public work in Washington state, the "Absher" and "Mike M. Johnson" cases have established pretty clearly that if a claim is not in writing and not made in a timely manner - however the contract describes timeliness - the contractor loses the ability to sustain a claim.

I think notice can take place by other than a specific written letter to the owner. Notice can be part of the weekly progress meetings or reports, notice can be the documentation of the issue in daily reports that are shared with the owner. Ultimately, the contractor and Owner should discuss and refine what is acceptable as reasonable notice, during the contract negotiations.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment